Monthly Archives: August 2020

Ohio Governor DeWine Impeachment Articles Introduced

Get the pdf of the impeachment articles. Misdemeanors merely? Nice quotes by Joseph Story. Articles introduced by state Rep. John Becker of Union township near Cincinnati.

“No single person or governor shall be permitted to assume dictatorial powers over the people”. The situation in Ohio is tyranny.

Michael Hart: Stationers’ Guild Oppresses the Poor

Project Gutenberg founder Michael S. Hart was acutely aware of the anti-progressive cartel-like aspect of copyright law. Hart was possibly the very first man who was able in 1989 to get the King James Bible freely distributed on the Internet. In his article, The History of Publishing, Hart states that copyright went through several phases which were reactions against technological improvements:

The Gutenberg Press Countered by The Statute of Anne, in 1709
The Steam Powered Press Countered by The US Copyright Act of 1831
The Electric Powered Press Countered by The US Copyright Act of 1909
The Xerox Machine Countered by The US Copyright Act of 1976
The Internet/World Wide Web Countered by The US Copyright Act of 1998

It is very notable that the corporate charter (1557) of Stationers’ Guild was actually issued by Phillip and Bloody Mary with the goal of censoring books deemed heretical.

Free Schaeffer Cox: Narco Pervs

A very enlightening letter about the root of government corruption from political prisoner Francis Schaeffer Cox and He was an Alaskan political candidate who was entrapped, framed, and put away in Little Guantanamo, in a CIA controlled Communications Management Unit.

Narco Pervs – Where are Schaeffer’s Supporters?

A letter by F. Schaeffer Cox.

…if they could take down a squeaky clean boy
scout like me, nobody is safe.
You really need to understand the criminal
environment in Alaska that gives rise to this Mafia
situation. First of all, Alaska is absolutely remote.
There is one 2000 mile long dirt road into Alaska.
Very little comes in on that road. And what does,
gets checked twice by Canada. Everything else must
come in through airports or sea ports that the Drug
Cops fully control. So that means drugs are hard for
non-law enforcement people to get into the state.
Which means the price is three times the normal
price you’d pay in the Lower-48. Then on top of
that, everyone in Alaska is super wealthy. So they
can pay the high prices. You have all the oil workers,
the miners, the fisherman, and the construction
contractors for remote military projects. They are
all single guys who work two weeks on, two weeks

off. When they come to town for their two weeks
off, they want to buy drugs and party. Then they go
back out. And they all get paid several thousand a
There are only two towns in Alaska: Anchorage,
and Fairbanks. The rest is just empty wilderness
that is accessible only by helicopter or bush plane.
There aren’t any roads. So you have two towns with
one way in or out, full of super rich working single
guys who will pay any price for drugs. It is probably
the best retail market for drugs in the world. The
Drug Task Force brings in and sells everything but
the weed. (Weed is grown locally by thousands of
people.) They bust their competitors, not their
customers or distributors. This is a multi billion
dollar industry that is surpassed only by oil and gas.
It beats all mining, fishing, and construction by a
long shot. So they have a large steak in protecting
their lucrative racket.
But how do a bunch of cocky alpha male drug

cops get a bunch of slimy, envious nerd bureaucrats
to not snitch them out? They need a certain type
that they know they can control — the pathetic perv
who wants to feel powerful so bad that he will
sexually abuse a child just to see the kid tremble in
Rural Alaska is dotted with Native villages full of
drunk Eskimos who don’t seem to notice too much
if the state takes a child away from them. This made
Alaska a ripe target for child molesters. The Catholic
Church was sending their incurable kid-diddler-
priests to Alaska to get rid of them. It was systemic
and the pervs were going hog wild here sexually
abusing hundreds of Native kids from broken homes
that had become wards of the state. The church got
in big trouble when the kids grew up and started
telling. People went to prison, huge civil
settlements were paid, and the church was forced
to clean house. But it wasn’t just the Catholic
Church in on it. It was pervs within government
bureaucracies too. But the government pervs were

able to stop the accountability epidemic from
spreading to them. So stopping the church from
molesting kids just meant more kids for the
government bureaucrats to molest!
This whole child sex abuse makes no sense to a
normal healthy man like you or me who is attracted
to smokn’ hot women. But it’s not about an erotic
attraction for these pervs. They aren’t drawn to a
prepubescent child the way a man is drawn to a
beautiful woman. For these pervs, it’s about getting
a feeling power relative to the kid they are sexually
abusing. The perv is getting off on their own feeling
of power, NOT THE KID. The kid they are abusing is
just a weak victim to facilitate the dark ritual of self-
worship and reveling in ones own power.
This is pretty sick, right? Well, the same
personality type that gets off on being a
government bureaucrat and feeling powerful over
the people they fine and boss around, is the same
personality type that gets off on sexually

dominating a helpless child. It’s Baphomet. And it’s
in every culture as far back as we have records.
If you want to control a meth-whore, just feed
her meth habit. As long as you are her source of
dope, she will do anything you tell her to do. And if
she gives you any trouble, just cut her dope off for a
few days and she will come crawling back saying
she’s sorry. It works the same way with cho-mo [child molester]
bureaucrats who are addicted to molesting helpless
kids. If you supply them with the “pets” to play
with, you have full control of them. They are as easy
to control as a meth-whore. Actually, probably
easier, since they talk back less. And child molesters
have zero self-respect to begin with, so a little
bullying puts them right in their place.
Now think about how Cops turn people into
informants. They just dress like a dope dealer, go
sell the addict some drugs, then flash their badge
and tell them they can either go to prison for
decades, or work as an informant. The drug addict

always says agrees to work for the cops. Now the
cop who just rolled them is their new “handler.”
The drug cops just run the same play on child
molesters and then boss around the cho-mo’s
whole life. They say “you want to ‘play with a new
pet?’ Just meet me in the Wet Willies Carwash at
7am. Text me when you get there.” Then the drug
cop gets in the car with the unsuspecting perv while
the bubbles are all over the car and records the guy
talking about how he wants to take the “pet” (i.e.
child) home for a few hours and have his way with
him. The cop then plays the pervs words back to
him and watches him turn ten shades of pale before
making him an offer that sounds pretty nice. “We
will not go to a grand jury with this recording, we
will pay you $2500 a month in tax free cash under
the table, we will tell the Ocean View play house to
let you in any time you want to visit the pets, and
we will make sure you are safe from any other legal
troubles for as long as you work for us. All you have
to do is shut down any cases we ask you to, promise

to not mess with any pets except the ones we
provide for you, and promise to do any other things
we need you to to keep us in a position where we
can continue making enough money to afford to
pay you and keep enough power to be able to make
sure you don’t end up having to try to explain your
“tastes.” “Help us help you,” the drug cops say. But
they warn the perv that if they ever cross their new
master, they will out them and send them to prison
for LIFE!!!
Then, if the perv they just rolled is a prosecutor
(which is very common) they tell them their first
task is to put a criminal investigation on this guy
over here who is on the Judicial Council and get rid
of him. So the Judicial Council guy resigns. Then
they go to their other pocket-perv and tell him to
get on the Judicial Council.
In Alaska, the governor can’t just appoint
whoever they want to be a state judge. They can
only appoint people who are nominated to them by

the Judicial Council. The Judicial Council is made
up of two lawyers and one non-lawyer. So with
three people, you can control all judgeships in
Alaska! With the Judicial Council stacked with perv
gatekeepers, the Drug Cops go out and get
whatever child molester they have ready to work,
and tell them to apply for a judgeship. Now you
have the Judicial Counsel giving only an assortment
of pocket-pervs to the governor to nominate. You
can literally get a judge who’s ONLY qualification is
that they like molesting kids.
The Drug Cops are sly and aggressive soldiers of
fortune. And they have done a very good job of
loading the system with lame beat down perv losers
they can control. And on top of getting to play with
the pets, the lames get a vicarious power-trip out of
feeling like they are part of the gang with the alpha
male drug cops.
This is how it works in real life. It’s heart breaking
and infuriating at the same time. But it’s a reality

we must face. This is how Alaska has been run since
the late 70s! Just think how easy it is to spread your
network after you get a few key posts filled with
reliable pervs. It just gets easier and easier as they
go, until they have the whole state under their total
control. That’s where it was when I was there.
It got so bad that everyone knew it and there
was nothing anyone could do. Because no mater
where you took a complaint, there was someone
there to shut you down and protect the child
molesters and drug dealing drug cops who put the
whole system together to protect the narco
I knew of a police-chief who crossed the pervs,
they sodomized and murdered his son. He was not
so bold after that. His daughter did some honest
things and got run off as well. A friend of mine had
her son murdered by one of the drug cops
distributors. The whole thing was on camera. But
the investigation went nowhere because the

murderer was part of the drug cop/ perv alliance.
Finally after enough public blowback, some state
prosecutors and police are trying to go after some
of these people. But Bottini has shut it all down.
Back when I was out, NOBODY would dare speak a
word about it. I was about the only one! And it cost
me my life.
I explained all this to explain how this narco-perv
society is holding the whole state government and
all the people hostage. People are rightfully scared
to support me openly. But I do get support. How do
you think I raised all that money? I have TONS of
support, just below the surface.
Maria Rensel was one of my Alaskan supporters.
But then they got to her. At least that’s what it
looks like happened. She was doing real good. She
was helping me in amazing ways. Then she got
arrested. She wouldn’t elaborate on it and after
that arrest she got real sketchy. I think that they

flipped her when they arrested her. That’s why they
let her go so fast. So she could work for them. She
started lying to me about what she was doing. She
started redacting the names of informants out of
my public letters behind my back. She started
blocking me from my own funds. Then when I called
her out on it, she cut off all communication and
disappeared with my defense fund. The
confirmation that she was working for The Dark
Side came when I tried to replace her and the
Counter Terrorism Unit told me I had to leave Maria
in charge of my defense fund, and that if I tried to
put anyone else in charge I would get major
sanctions and they would cut off all my
I took my losses of course.
So this is the context in which you ask where all
my supporters are? They are in an underground war
for their country, their livelihood, and their life.
They haven’t forgotten me. They are just pinned

down by evil right now.
If you have propaganda to keep people confused,
and secret police to keep people scared, you can
control the masses cheap and easy. But the danger
is it only takes one fearless guy who sees through
the racket to cause major major problems. If the
narco-pervert alliance thinks there is even a chance
that you may be that kind of fearless leader, they
will preemptively ruin you, just to “err on the side of
caution” as one drug cop told me in an 8 hour
My family would do what I ask them to do. If that
was to give public statements. They’d do it. But
what I want them to do is let me fight this battle
myself while they take care of the kids I left behind.
They are the only ones who can salvage my
children’s childhoods. So that’s what I want them to
do for now.
–Schaeffer Cox

(Letter as received through R. Davis. With typos corrected and emphasis added.)

John Paul Rice: A Child’s Voice

John Paul Rice explains what happened when Amazon censored his film, A Child’s Voice (2018), which was against rings of child molesters and child murderers.

…and John Paul Rice was interviewed on the Alex Jones Show on Monday, August 10th 2020, (Filmmaker Censored on Amazon for Exposing Child Trafficking Speaks Out).

Dave Hodges: Secret Indictments In the Red Square of Portage County, Ohio Sheriff’s Department

Dave Hodge’s hosts the Common Sense Show, and has a history of land rights litigation and public advocacy for patriotic causes. This is a comment on the arrest of Millie Weaver, a contractor paid by Alex Jones who was making a documentary important to Trump called Shadowgate.

Hopefully, there is an unsealed indictment at this time, given that she has been arrested. Bizarre that the deputy arresting appeared not to know why he was arresting.

Millie Weaver’s interviewee, Tore, posted the documentary Millie was working on:

The Gist of Executive Order #13925 Preventing Online Censorship, May 28 2020

The Gist of Executive Order #13925 Preventing Online Censorship, May 28 2020

By Jacob Shreffler. May 29th 2020. This article may be distributed anywhere in its entirety.

The True Construction of the Federal Decency Act

The federally created grant of immunity to certain Internet service providers (which is including social media web site providers such as Youtube, Facebook, and Twitter) at U.S. Code title 47 section 230, which is from the Communications Decency Act of 1996, part of the federal Telecommunications Act of 1996 [Volume 110 U.S. Statutes at Large p. 56], has been broadly construed beyond immunizing the censorship of content for the “good faith” belief that the content censored was indecent. The statutory phrase is: “obscene, lewd, lascivious, filthy, excessively violent, harassing or otherwise objectionable”. Through this Executive Order, Trump is essentially accusing companies like Google, Youtube, Twitter, and Facebook of being guilty of bad faith. One of the the controversies is whether “otherwise objectionable” is to be construed narrowly under the purposes of the Decency Act, or construed broadly to effect Democrat machine goals of political censorship having nothing to do with indecency.

[Footnote: For those having libertarian leanings: One might be interested to know briefly what kind of grounds might exist for this Executive Order and possible future Congressional actions which may be arising from the interplay between proprietary rights held by government and the private sector. For the purposes of basic constitutional history, important early case precedents upholding Constitutional authority for government regulation might be found in cases concerning the regulations under the postal clause and in cases concerning telegraphy by railroads or AT&T and its predecessors. Note that companies like AT&T and RCA were once subjected to control or influence by Navy Intelligence and the Postmaster General, which control may have been abused to circumvent antitrust laws. Also note that McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) in the supreme court of the United States, concerning federally created implicit immunity for banks from state taxation, is premised on the mingling of federal and private funds in the hands of a banker, and that Internet Service Providers and social media websites are, by a loose analogy, mingling the transmission of state, federal, and privately produced content. A user of the Internet may be deemed to be placing his datagrams in federal hands in some jurisdictional sense, in an analogy to the federal and private-express-statute postal system. Note also that common carrier regulations have an origin in common law precedents concerning bailments such as bailments of wine casks which were dropped and broken, and in early cases concerning regulations on hotels and ferries.]

This author suspects that the strategy of the leftist political machines, including Twitter, Facebook, and their third party censoring organization who were encouraged by Senator Blumenthal, may well be the following: In addition to creating cultish political agitation in favor of censorship, they may also be trying to build a future case that Republicans may be censored online because they are legally indecent under the statutory phrase, and that this implicitly alleged indecency arises out of alleged racist or Nazi-like political beliefs which violates statements of so-called “Community Guidelines” amounting to a tacit corporate policy based definition of “indecency”. As near as this author can tell at a glance, the present Section 230 case law has not usually gone any further than to just say that the 230 immunity is to be “broadly” construed, to allow censorship of unsolicited bulk emails, blacklisting of ‘unwanted’ software, and so forth, without any showing concerning the original statutory concept of indecency, and therefore the judiciary remains a potential threat to this EO going forward as the censors may have no choice but to carry forward an attempt to prove in court that Republican or patriotic speech is legally indecent.

The EO asks the Secretary of Commerce (and with assistance from the USAG) to act through the NTIA, in the Department of Commerce (which historically has replaced DARPA, NSF, and DCA as an agency having authority over the Internet) to petition the FCC to implement regulations “to clarify” the construction of the Section 230 immunity to make a “narrow” construction of 230 so that a national policy of (Sec. 2) “promoting free and open debate on the internet” is implemented.

Concerning Communism:

*EO Preamble: “One United States company, for example, created a search engine for the Chinese Communist Party that would have blacklisted searches for ‘human rights,’ hid data unfavorable to the Chinese Communist Party, and tracked users determined appropriate for surveillance.”

*EO Sec. 5b: USAG Working Group to collect information regarding “differential policies allowing for otherwise impermissible behavior, when committed by accounts associated with the Chinese Communist Party or other anti-democratic associations or governments”.

POTUS asks the United States Attorney General to convene a working group inviting State Attorneys General and then propose State (Sec. 5) and Federal (Sec. 6) Legislations for carrying into effect the policies of this Order.

The EO asks: Does it violate Unfair and Deceptive Practices statutes when social media sites represent themselves as neutral platforms?

In Sec. 4: “It is the policy of the United States that large online platforms, such as Twitter and Facebook, as the critical means of promoting the free flow of speech and ideas today, should not restrict protected speech”.

The May 2019 Tech Bias complaints to Whitehouse to be passed on to Department of Justice, FTC (4b), and the USAG’s Working Group (5b).

This author expects the authority of the FCC to promulgate regulations construing statutory indecency under section 230 may be challenged in court.

There is even a possibility we will see a supreme court case where both sides are raising a first amendment issue. [ ]

Whistler v. DTCC

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. No. 06-16088.
August 22, 2008
NSCC National Securities Clearing Corporation also a defendant.
Amazing case. Says the SEC can preempt state law by approving the policy/program/plan of a self regulatory organization. So basically the NSCC Stock Borrow Program allows stock broker-dealers to sell stocks which do not exist, as part of the naked short sale system, and then continuously fail to deliver them. So the private clearinghouse has essentially been given a monopoly and can write its own legislation to override state law. One wonders what happens when it comes time to vote the non-existent stocks and brokerage customers can’t vote them? Perhaps there is a lottery like for payments in lieu of dividends.

“Because the Commission, in accordance with the congressional directive set forth in Section 17A, has approved NSCC’s creation of the Stock Borrow Program and the rules it has promulgated to govern Stock Borrow Program operations, we hold that state-law challenges to the existence or the operation of the Stock Borrow Program are federally preempted because they would conflict with congressional directive, as set forth under Section 17A.”

Tehranian’s Infringement Nation

Tehranian, John, Infringement Nation: Copyright Reform and the Law/Norm Gap (2007). Utah Law Review, Vol. 2007, p. 537

Tehranian is a must read primer on the tyranny of the modern copyright system. Theoretical misconstructions. Court ordered destruction of infringing tattoos. Multimillion dollar civil liability of a law professor for casually clicking Reply and Forward buttons in his email program. Unwitting secondary liability for subscribing (a contribution?) to a magazine which happens to be infringing. Casual public performances (radio too loud). When a private publication is a public performance (lectures quoting a poem).

“By the end of the day, John has […] committed at least eighty-three acts of infringement and faces liability in the amount of $12.45 million (to say nothing of potential criminal charges). There is nothing particularly extraordinary about John’s activities”.

National Veterans v. United States


Appellate opinion (appeal no. 19-1081) of August 6th, 2020 from US Courts of Appeals Federal Circuit in Washington, D.C., from Techdirt. The Administrative Office of the United States Courts damaged PACER users downloading electronic court records by overcharging and spending the revenue on the wrong purpose. Expect future discounts on the now excessive $0.10/pg to $3.00/pdf and transcript download charges. Large law firms might not mind excessive fees, but it has been extremely oppressive to pro se and poor litigants ever since the revenue exceeded the costs of running the PACER website.